Another favorite rant: Art education and what needs to be said.

So I’ve been away for a while. But I’m ba-a-a-a-ck! 😀 I’ve been doing a lot of painting and studying. I’ll be posting some new paintings shortly and talking about all kinds of stuff. But first I have to post more about art education. It’s a continuation of this bit of pontification from the main site.

Let’s start out with this graphic which is going around Facebook:

Very typical, I must say. (Click on image to see a larger version of it.) NOTE: The artwork on the right (and presumably on the left) is by artist Travis Seymour.

Before I go any farther, let me say that I’m certainly not against getting an art education, or an art degree. I went to Otis, a very good art school in Los Angeles. I count my time at Otis as one of the happiest eras of my life. So, it’s not that the concept of schooling, or that the art degree are bad, it’s what they’ve often become. 

Yes, the graphic I show above is what’s often happening nowadays. I see a lot of it. I saw a lot of it when I was going to Otis. (In case you don’t know what an atelier is, it’s a small, more affordable private school that focuses on traditional, classic art skills. Here’s a web page which lists some well-known ateliers.)

It’s usually coming from the Fine Art Department. The message seems to be, that skill is a bad thing. Skill is something to be looked down on, as lowly, as “competent.” (At Otis I had a Fine Art student sneer that word—competent—at me, like she’d said something dirty or profane.) Skill is something that “if you decide it’s important,” you can “learn on your own.” Or, you’re supposed to “bring it with you” when you enter a degree program, because they sure as heck aren’t going to teach it to you! Continue reading Another favorite rant: Art education and what needs to be said.